Showing posts with label Roth IRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roth IRA. Show all posts

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Money Tips - Roth IRA Edition



It has been a while since I have added to the Money Tips library here at BadskiBlog and I really need to get better at keeping it updated. Not only could some of the advice or links help some people, but it also serves as my own little reference library to keep me down the right path financially. Back when I was playing Jr and eventually college hockey we always hit the summers hard for off season training. However, it wasn't complex drills and systems. It was always "back to basics" time. Its the little things that matter and make you better, and I think it is a great lesson to live in your financial life as well. Do the basics, like living the BadskiBlog definition of being rich, better day in and day out and you will attain your goals. In this post I wanted to take the opportunity to provide some guidance on one of the best retirement investing vehicles out there (especially if you are young); the Roth IRA. I keep the difference between the Roth and the Traditional IRA straight by saying the Roth is taxed in and free out. Which basically means that you contribute with after tax income on the way in, but the gains you build over the years are not taxed when you begin to withdraw the money (meeting all the prescribed criteria). If you have time on your side and don't have a dire need to lower your current tax bracket, which is probably most people under 35, then you should max this out every year. Here are two articles that not only give great insight into the benefits of the Roth IRA, but some special circumstances that you can use to make the most out of the investment vehicle.

The first article that I found on CNN Money can be read in its entirety here. This article starts out talking about specifics of the IRA and the general guidelines and stipulations surrounding it as an investing option. However, the article goes on to say that with retirement planning the wild card has always been the changing tax laws. But there is hope.

The uncertain tax outlook can be paralyzing. "The whole idea of not knowing how much money you really have saved because you don't know how much you're going to have to pay in taxes makes it impossible to plan," says Keith Maliniak, a 60-year-old physician in Harrisburg, Pa.

But even if you don't know how high your rates will be, there are steps you can take to insulate your retirement stake from the vagaries of the tax code. Luckily, you have a weapon in the war on taxes: the Roth IRA.


The author then goes on to say that we are at near historic low tax rates and that they will likely rise in years to come. This makes it one of the prime times in history to do a Roth IRA conversion.

If your income is below the IRS limits, you can contribute up to $5,000 a year to a Roth ($6,000 if you are over 50). Some companies have begun to offer Roth 401(k)s, which have no income limits. But for the most part, high earners have to settle for converting existing IRAs and paying the tax bill. As part of the deal, if you convert in 2010 you can stretch the tax payments out over three years, easing the pain.

The questions of whether — and how much — to convert are complicated and there's no one-size-fits-all answer. When you convert, the money in the IRA is added to your taxable income. This could bump you up into a higher tax bracket: "If you earn $120,000 a year and want to convert $200,000 of IRA money, that will throw you from the 28% tax bracket to the 36% bracket for that particular year," says Leonard.

That said, advisers suggest that the combination of the stock market slump and the likelihood of future tax increases makes today an ideal moment to convert traditional IRAs to Roths. "First, we're at historic low income tax rates," says James Lange, a CPA and lawyer and the author of Retire Secure. "Second, if you believe stocks go up over time, and that we're at a low point, this is probably one of the best times in history to convert."

In general, conversion may make most sense for younger people who are in lower tax brackets and have smaller IRA balances. That's because their tax hit will be lighter and they'll have a long time for the assets to grow tax-free before they need to make withdrawals.

But there are situations in which even high earners and older people may want to convert. Lange offers this example. "Let's say you used to have income of $150,000, and you got laid off and you're only going to have income of $60,000 this year," he says. "You're hoping to get a job and be back where you were next year. Then you should make the conversion this year because you'll be in a much lower tax bracket."

For some folks, the appeal of leaving tax-free accounts to heirs may be reason enough to move to a Roth. That's what persuaded Carroll Harris, a 68-year-old Southport, N.C., resident, to begin converting his traditional IRAs in 2008; he plans to do more conversions in 2009, 2010, and 2011 to spread out his tax payments. "I'd rather bite the bullet and pay the tax now," says Harris, who worked for 30 years in the international transportation business. "It's going to be a tremendous asset for my children and their children down the road because it will sit there and build for 30 or 40 years for them tax-free!"

One thing the experts agree on: Don't convert unless you can pay your taxes out of other cash — using assets from your IRA to pay the taxes is a losing proposition. "If you're paying the tax from the account itself, you're lengthening the break-even period because you have a lesser amount of money in the account growing tax-free," says Fisher.

There is some really good stuff in there to think about no matter what age you are or what your current financial situation is. Retirement planning applies to all of us and the Roth is one of your better options to reach your retirement goals in my opinion.

The next article is a bit more somber, but being in the military I thought I should share it with others to spread the word. I found this article on Jeff Rose's Good Financial Cents blog, which is a kickass financial planner blog out of Illinois. It can get a little bit more technical than I tend to get but it has awesome advice and it very detailed. His post is on the "Hero IRA" or the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act other wise called the Heroes or Heart Act. You can read the full post here. In essence it is a law where you take the SGLI life insurance benefit from a service member who has passed away in combat, and place it into a Roth tax free. This is similar to the conversion above, however you would not be responsible to pay taxes on the entire amount. That is an unbelievable tax break. Obviously I hope that NO ONE ever has to use this option, however we are at war and maybe this information will help someone who is already suffering from the loss of a loved one.
Having served overseas in Iraq, this should have caught my attention earlier. It wasn’t until I recently lost a brother in arms that I happened on a little blurb in the IRS publication 590 on the SGLI. If you are not in the military or have a family member in the military, it probably wouldn’t mean anything to you. SGLI stands for Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance. It’s the life insurance that the government provides to all our military members. When I first got in the military the most you were allowed to get insured for was $250,000. Right about the time I was deployed, the government increased that amount to $400,000. The cost is minimal; $0.65 per $1000 of life insurance. While serving overseas, it’s a no-brainer.

Basically, the surviving beneficiary of a lost soldier soldier serving overseas is allowed to rollover the full amount into a Roth IRA. As you know, I’m a huge fan of the Roth IRA and this provides a tremendous opportunity to put an enormous chunk into for tax free growth. Remember, the full SGLI amount is $400,000 and that amount could be completely rolled into the Roth. To illustrate how that might impact someone, look at this calculation:



Let’s assume a 25 year old widow were to invest the full $400,000 and average 8% return over a 25 year period, she will have accumulated $2,739,390.08. She won’t be able to get it all yet. (She’ll have to wait until 59 1/2 for that). But she will have access to the original $400,000 since it’s treated as a “rollover contribution” and as you know or may not know, you always have access to your contributions in a Roth IRA. Another aspect is that if there are surviving children, they will inherit the money tax free. Another great aspect of the Roth that often goes overlooked.


If there are any other topics you want to hear more about on Money Tips just leave a comment. If I don't know about it (which is very possible) I will find someone who does to do a guest post.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Money Tips - Asset Allocation Continued

Last Money Tips post we spoke about Asset Allocation. It was more of a crash course on what asset allocation is, and it gave very general ideas on what to consider when creating your strategy. This post I am including my current asset allocation strategy for my Roth IRA, some other concepts to be aware of, and some examples of what I do to ensure that I am carrying out my strategy. Above you see a pie chart detailing my ideal asset allocation for my Roth IRA. I currently have all my investment holdings in funds from USAA and Vanguard. Both are renowned for their low expense ratios, customer service, and ease of use and I can attest that their reputations are well earned. As I touched on a bit in my other asset allocation post, I have a few different asset classes represented in my portfolio. I have mutual funds made up of stocks, bonds, real estate, and precious metals and minerals. Typically, these different asset classes are not heavily correlated, but in times like these it seems that way! Within those classes I have large, mid, and small cap holdings, foreign and domestic holdings, and every sector from financials to technology. What am I trying to illustrate here? Diversification and lack of correlation as to limit variation and lock in gains.

Here is my basic justification for what I am trying to do. I have 5% in my income fund which is a bond fund. I did this because bonds typically aren't correlated heavily with stocks and they are less volatile with regard to their returns. With lower risk comes lower returns and the bond fund is no exception, although many are predicting that the near future could be a great time for bonds. Since I am young and far away from cashing out my retirement fund I have a small percentage of bonds in my portfolio opting instead to take stocks that, although are more variable in their returns, provide a higher historical rate of return. 70% of my holdings are funds that are made up primarily of stocks. As we become more intertwined in the global marketplace I think more and more growth opportunities are going to be available overseas. For this reason, I probably have more of my portfolio than most people invested in foreign securities. I figure with a long term time horizon this is a safe play as well. I am also probably exposed more than most people to small caps and technology assets. This also goes back to time horizon and my ability to tolerate risk and accept short term losses. The largest fund in my portfolio is the S&P 500 fund. This fund is represented by the largest 500 publicly traded companies, and it serves as a very good indicator of how the economy as a whole is performing. If you think investing is too hard or you don't know where to begin, invest in an index fund like the S&P 500 or a total market index fund and you will likely be ahead of many people who try to outperform the market through buying and selling. I make this a large portion of my portfolio because it represents the market as a whole and traditionally it is a good diversified fund of large cap stocks. The rest of my portfolio is made up of a REIT fund and a valuable metals and minerals fund. I chose a REIT a while back because it is not normally heavily correlated with stocks (except in our current crisis when real estate caused the crisis), REITS are required by law to pay 90% of their income back to shareholders, and REITs are a low cost option to diversify into the world of real estate. REITs are also great to put into a Roth IRA (taxed on the way in, not on the way out) because the income returned and reinvested by the shareholders into the fund dodges what would be taxable income. The metals and minerals fund serves as a diversification fund that is not heavily correlated with my other holdings, and also serves as an inflationary hedge.

My portfolio is far from perfect and I would love to hear some comments on your recommendations. However it is a strategy that I created on my own that I follow and enjoy working with. And as I have said before, my returns are currently beating all the major indexes in the current economy so I am doing better than I would have by putting it all in the S&P and probably better than I would have turning my money over to an actively managed account with a broker. Some concerns that I have about my portfolio are that my funds have overlap. Some of my Emerging Markets holdings may be represented in my International fund or one of the other funds. I am sure the same holds true in most of my funds. This skews my actual percentages and naturally diminishes some of the diversification I am attempting to achieve. I also replicate some of my Roth funds in my non retirement holdings which alters my overall exposure to a certain asset class, segment, fund, or holding. I could probably track down funds with higher historical performance as well. However, all things considered with the time I put in I am fairly content with the strategy I have.
The chart above shows where my actual holdings are. They are off my ideal asset allocation based on a few factors. First reason is the gains and losses (mostly losses) over time. It also stems from adding new funds, and not investing up to the ideal amount based on IRA limits or lack of money. And finally it can become unbalanced due to a change in strategy. So what do we do about it? We can re-balance! Re-balancing is key to buying more when prices are low and less when prices are high alongside with another concept know as dollar cost averaging. Re-balancing is just what it sounds like. You are adjusting the amounts you have in each fund to return them to their ideal percentages. You can do this by shifting money from fund to fund, or by adding more to the lacking funds. Obviously you don't want to remove money from your retirement investments. As you can see, my REIT and Metals funds are the ones that are drastically lower than their ideal percentage. I like to look for the ones that are lower instead of ones that are over their ideal percentage because it forces me to add more money instead of just shifting money around. It makes the math a little more difficult but I just play with it in excel based on how much money I have to invest until I get close. Some people recommend re-balancing every quarter. I must admit that I typically do it around the end of the year or tax time as I am either putting last minute funds in to max out my contribution for the year, or I am putting money that I got back from my taxes into my next year's contribution (not a good habit as I should figure out my W-4 withholding and make that money work for me all year). The re-balancing shows you which funds have performed well since your last re-balance and which funds have not. When you buy more of the ones that have not to bring them to their ideal percentage you are buying when the fund is cheap. By buying less or none of the funds that are over their ideal percentage you are avoiding funds that are priced higher.

The other way to effectively buy low is through dollar cost averaging. Dollar cost averaging refers to investing the same amount each selected time period no matter how the market is performing. So if you invest $50 per month in each fund you will be buying fewer shares the higher priced they are and you will be buying more shares of the lesser priced funds. This is an excellent way to avoid timing the market while mindlessly, intelligently investing. I must say that I have not been dollar cost averaging as of late as I have been striving to reach another financial goal which requires more liquid assets. In this market I am actually making more on my money market anyway, but as a contrarian I want to take advantage of the sale the bear market has created. I have almost reached my cash equivalents goal and plan to start my dollar cost averaging habit again for my other investments.
The chart above shows what I described above. As you can see I added money to my REIT and Metals fund in order to get my percentages closer to the ideal state. I am expecting some money back from Uncle Sugar in taxes (again a bad habit I plan on breaking) and I will likely max out my Roth contribution for the year which is set at $5,000. I am sure if you Google asset allocation you can find a wealth of information out there, some good some bad and some that probably doesn't fully match all that I have told you. My advice as always is find what works for you. Is my method the most efficient and highest earning strategy in the world? Highly unlikely. But I am maxing out my Roth and learning a bit along the way and that is what truly matters. Like I said before please leave comments on my portfolio or request feedback on your own portfolio and start investing!